Jobs can fail due to exceptions occurring. When your RQ workers run in the background, how do you get notified of these exceptions?
The default safety net for RQ is the
failed queue. Every job that fails
execution is stored in here, along with its exception information (type,
value, traceback). While this makes sure no failing jobs "get lost", this is
of no use to get notified pro-actively about job failure.
Starting from version 0.3.1, RQ supports registering custom exception
handlers. This makes it possible to replace the default behaviour (sending
the job to the
failed queue) altogether, or to take additional steps when an
To do this, register your custom exception handler to an RQ worker as follows:
While the exception handlers are a FILO stack, most times you only want to register a single handler. Therefore, for convenience, you can pass it to the constructor directly, too:
The handler itself is a function that takes the following parameters:
You might also see the three exception arguments encoded as:
The handler itself is responsible for deciding whether or not the exception
handling is done, or should fall through to the next handler on the stack.
The handler can indicate this by returning a boolean.
False means stop
True means continue and fall through to the next
exception handler on the stack.
It's important to know for implementors that, by default, when the handler
doesn't have an explicit return value (thus
None), this will be interpreted
True (i.e. continue with the next handler).
To replace the default behaviour (i.e. moving the job to the
use a custom exception handler that doesn't fall through, for example: